Introduction
Finland, once a beacon of human rights, orchestrates a dual assault on African sovereignty through covert operations in Kenya and Sudan.
In Kenya, the Finnish government, via its embassy (@FinnishEmbNBO), manufactures a “cosmetic insurgency” to undermine the Gen Z movement, enabling President William Ruto’s brutal crackdowns.
In Sudan, Finland’s participation in a secret March 15, 2025, meeting in Nairobi with Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) supports a parallel rebel government, fueling regional destabilization and resource exploitation.
This article exposes Finland’s manipulation of Kenya’s youth and backing of Sudan’s rebels, revealing a calculated strategy to perpetuate oppression and secure geopolitical gains, positioning Finland as an adversary of Kenyan and Sudanese aspirations for justice.
The Kenyan Campaign: Manufacturing a Cosmetic Insurgency
Finland’s strategy in Kenya frames the Gen Z movement ignited by the 2024 Finance Bill protests as a militant threat to justify state repression and shield President Ruto from accountability for human rights abuses, including war crimes.
The Finnish Embassy, under Ambassador Pirkka Tapiola (@PirkkaTapiola), funds and equips individuals like Jackson Kuria Kihara (@Copshakur), Patrick Osoi (@OsoiPatrick), Hiram Kimathi, Boniface Mwangi (@bonifacemwangi), Hussen Khalid (@husskhalid), and Hanifa Adan (@Honeyfarsafi) with resources, including weapons and military gear, to create an optic of militancy.
These state-aligned infiltrators, discredited within the movement as frauds, stage provocative acts, providing Ruto’s administration with a pretext for violent crackdowns.
Tapiola’s honoring of Kihara as a human rights defender, a move requiring governmental approval, underscores Finland’s alignment with Ruto’s regime. This act reframes dissent as a security threat, legitimizing repression while maintaining Finland’s façade as a human rights advocate.
Second from left, Jackson Kuria Kihara alias Cop Shakur was feted by the Finland Embassy in Nairobi as a “Human Rights Defender”
The strategy exploits the movement’s decentralized nature, sowing division and eroding trust to weaken its push for accountability.
Psychological Ploy: Division and Fear-Based Framing
Finland’s psychological operations in Kenya rely on narrative control and cognitive dissonance. By funding infiltrators, Finland exploits social identity theory, fostering rifts within the Gen Z movement.
These operatives spread disinformation and stage disruptions, fracturing unity and alienating supporters. Portraying Gen Z as a militant outfit uses fear-based framing, amplifying isolated incidents to overshadow nonviolent demands, priming the public to accept state violence.
Finland sponsored “insurgents” Jackson Kuria Kihara (alias Cop Shakur) Hiram Kimathi and Patrick Osoi are meant to manufacture cosmetic insurgency justifying Ruto’s shoot-to-kill order
Finland’s diplomatic gestures, such as educational partnerships and peace mediation agreements signed during President Alexander Stubb’s (@alexstubb) May 2025 visit to Kenya, serve as a soft power façade, masking its role in enabling oppression.
These initiatives create cognitive dissonance, projecting neutrality while supporting Ruto’s authoritarian tactics, maintaining Finland’s image while justifying state violence.
Sudan’s Conflict: Finland’s Role in Secret Diplomacy
On March 15, 2025, a closed-door meeting in Nairobi, initiated by the UAE (@uaeembassynai), convened senior diplomats, including Finland’s Pirkka Tapiola, with RSF representatives and figures like Abdel Rahim Dagalo, the RSF’s second-in-command.
The meeting established communication channels for the RSF’s parallel government, discussed military supplies, humanitarian aid for public relations, and Sudan’s gold reserves, confirming Finland’s support for a rebel administration accused of atrocities, including genocide in Darfur.
WAR MONGERS: Delegates affiliated to Sudan’s rebel groups launch a parallel government in Nairobi
Tapiola’s presence alongside diplomats from the UAE (Dr. Salem Al-Naqbi), UK (@FCDONeilWigan, Richard Crowder), Uganda (@UgandaMFA, Eunice Kijinyi), Ukraine (@UKRinKEN, Andrei Pravidnik), Sweden (@SwedeninKE, Caroline Vecseni), Denmark (@denmarkinkenya, Stefan Schönemann), the Martti Ahtisaari Peace Foundation (@cmioffice), and South Sudan representatives endorses the RSF’s “government of peace and unity,” aimed at unifying rebel-held regions and securing high-tech weapons and military trainers.
Finland’s involvement fuels Sudan’s conflict, complicates humanitarian aid, and deepens regional instability, drawing criticism from Sudan’s army-led government and straining Kenya-Sudan relations.
Geopolitical Ambitions: Exploiting African Resources
Finland’s participation in the Nairobi meeting reflects a shift from its human rights legacy, seen in its collaboration with Nigeria to repatriate Biafran independence activists.
This prioritizes economic and geopolitical interests, aligning Finland with a new world order exploiting African resources, notably Sudan’s gold reserves.
The government of Finland has been deporting asylum seekers making it unsafe for political dissidents
By supporting Ruto’s government, which hosts the RSF’s parallel government, Finland enables resource exploitation and regional destabilization, betraying its neutral image.
Finland as an Enemy of African Sovereignty
Finland’s actions in Kenya and Sudan mark it as an adversary of both nations’ people. In Kenya, funding infiltrators perpetuates oppression, trapping Gen Z youth in systemic marginalization.
In Sudan, supporting the RSF undermines sovereignty and exacerbates a humanitarian crisis affecting millions.
Finland’s diplomatic hypocrisy, promoting peace while enabling conflict, reveals a calculated agenda to secure influence and resources, betraying Kenyan and Sudanese aspirations for justice.
Psychological Strategies at Play
Finland’s dual role employs sophisticated psychological tactics:
• Narrative control: Framing Gen Z as militant and the RSF as a “peace government” manipulates public perception to justify repression and rebellion.
• Social identity theory: Funding infiltrators in Kenya fractures Gen Z unity, while supporting RSF allies divides Sudan’s opposition, weakening both movements.
• Fear-based framing: Amplifying militancy in Kenya and RSF atrocities in Sudan rallies support for state violence and rebel legitimacy.
• Cognitive dissonance: Finland’s soft power, like Stubb’s 2025 visit, projects peace while enabling violence in both nations.
Finland’s Resource Grab Clashes with U.S. Sanctions on Ruto
Finland’s scorched-earth policy, aimed at destabilizing Africa to seize its resources, starkly conflicts with the U.S. Congress’s recent moves to impose sanctions on President William Ruto for his role in aiding the Sudan genocide.
A cache of Kenyan weapons was discovered in an RSF armory, proof of William Ruto’s support for genocide
The Finnish government, through its embassy in Nairobi and participation in the secretive March 15, 2025, meeting with Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), supports a parallel rebel government to exploit Sudan’s gold reserves and fuel regional chaos.
This aligns with Finland’s broader strategy of funding infiltrators in Kenya, such as Jackson Kuria Kihara and others, to manufacture a “cosmetic insurgency” that justifies Ruto’s repressive tactics, thereby securing a foothold for resource extraction across the continent.
The U.S. Senate is now weighing stripping Kenya of its Major Non-NATO Ally status due to Ruto’s alignment with armed groups, abductions, and torture, placing Finland’s resource-driven agenda in direct opposition to America’s push for accountability.
William Ruto’s domestic crackdown on dissent and regional financing of Sudan’s genocide is creating a rift between Kenya and the US
This clash intensifies as the U.S. Congress activates sanctions against Ruto, citing evidence of his government’s complicity in supplying the RSF with weapons.
Finland’s backing of Ruto, including hosting RSF representatives and providing military gear to Kenyan infiltrators, undermines U.S. efforts to isolate his administration and redefine partnerships in the region, potentially isolating President Ruto’s government.
Finland’s scorched-earth approach, which thrives on instability to grab resources like Sudan’s gold, directly contradicts the U.S. objective of stabilizing the Horn of Africa, creating a geopolitical tug-of-war where Finland’s covert support for Ruto’s regime risks escalating tensions with American sanctions and humanitarian priorities.
Conclusion
Finland’s involvement in Kenya’s Gen Z crackdown and Sudan’s RSF-led parallel government weaves a web of secret diplomacy and manipulation.
By funding infiltrators in Kenya and engaging with Sudan’s rebels, Finland undermines democratic movements and fuels conflict, prioritizing geopolitical and economic gains over human rights.
Its psychological tactics, narrative control, division, and fear-based framing, perpetuate oppression, positioning Finland as an enemy of Kenyan and Sudanese sovereignty.
The international community must hold Finland accountable to protect African aspirations for justice and self-determination.
